It has been a long time since I wrote anything. That is not a practice that I like very much–leaving the blog for so long. It just reminds me that I need to practice what I truly want, which is to have more time in my life to reflect, think, and write.
So, this morning, someone posted something on my Facebook–yes, this is going to be one of those meta discussions where the virtual discussion on Facebook provides a platform for deep thoughts from Ms. Bea at 7am–and I wanted to respond. I responded a little bit on the FB, but this is a topic that comes up quite a bit and is good fodder for discussion.
So, yesterday, I got contacted by a friend of a friend who’s booking some entertainment for the holidays. Awesome. I love corporate gigs, because they often mean good money, great craft service, and really appreciative audiences (who don’t spend their whole time drinking Miller Lite and discussing the Bears. Cough. But I malign my sisters…). Anyway, the gist was that this was a men’s club of lawyers (warning bells) who wanted to know if such a thing as “comedy strippers” existed (red flag!) and if so, could I find some to perform at their mens’ club gathering? Last year, they hired comedians and it was a hit.
Now, I can only assume that the conversation leading up to “Do comedy strippers even exist?” went something like this:
Attorney 1: Man, those comedians last year were FUNNY. Let’s do that again.
Attorney 2: Yeah, but Chip was saying we should get strippers.
Attorney 3: Wait, dudes, what if there was such a thing as a COMEDY STRIPPER?!
All (muffled crowd noises): Oh yeah, good idea. Skip, you’re a genius! Totally. Sexy AND funny! Dude! Hot and hilarious!
I politely told the guy that if he was looking for striptease (ala vintage style) with a campy, hilarious flavor that we could definitely bring them a great show. I know a lot of gals who are pretty hilarious and do the striptease. However, if they were looking for people who fit a generally mainstream stripper aesthetic, we were definitely not their girls. We tend to have a more “alternative” look and are not all skinny, blonde, and large-breasted. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but if that was the look they wanted, we were not it. But I said that we are hilarious and we are extremely sexy.
Then I posted on Facebook that I am not a comedy stripper, just to see what kind of response I got.
One of the responses (actually two, one responding to the other) got me thinking again about this idea of burlesque/sex work/stripping. On one hand, there is the argument that burlesque is not sex work because it does not “denigrate” the woman–as though all sex workers are somehow “lower” than women who would choose burlesque. On another, we are all getting naked it in the end, so what’s the dif? And then there’s the concept (not so popular in mainstream society) that there is such a thing as a woman who chooses sex work because it pays a lot of money and who has agency in her choices.
Either way, it comes down to class. I believe that people who think that burlesque is not sex work or not stripping (if you don’t want to call stripping sex work) have some kind of unexamined classism at work. There’s no doubt that the style of burlesque differs from the style of modern stripping. And there’s no doubt that the theatrics are different–one’s more obvious than the other. But there’s also no doubt that burlesque is the great auntie of modern stripping. When the striptease evolved, burlesque performers were not modern performance art practitioners dabbling in a “naughty art form” for tits and giggles. They were, as strippers are today, considered a “base” form of entertainment.
I really think that modern burlesque performers who try to draw a distinction between themselves and strippers are attempting to 1) justify their work to a middle class audience that thinks that taking off your clothes is shameful; 2) trying to distance themselves from women who strip for a living because they see those women as “lower” than themselves and 3) trying to pull the idea of burlesque into the real of “legitimate” entertainment, as though it’s not already there. This argument almost always comes from a defensive place on the part of the dancer and it is really popular with the press.
Whenever the question comes up for me, I liken it to a front of the hand/back of the hand thing. Neither could exist without the other. I try to educate members of the press, especially (since we have a really well-known J-school just north of us) to the younger cadre that love to write about us. I always say that burlesque differs from stripping in a few ways, but I would never say that one is “better” than the other or malign a stripper for choosing that form.
Yes, it is true that the styles differ greatly–in setting, costume, makeup, movement and choice of music. The production values are generally more slick in a stripping establishment and more hown-grown in a burlesque context. Audiences are probably different, in that more women tend to come to burlesque shows.
But audiences expect one thing that runs through all of this: nudity. You can’t call either thing by its name without that expectation being fulfilled.